Whelan And Lesniak Attack RAWA As Hearing Snowed Out
Senator Jim Whelan, who along side Senator Ray Lesniak has called on nj-new jersey’s news to fight RAWA.
New Jersey Senators Jim Whelan and Ray Lesniak have launched a blistering attack on the Restoration of America’s Wire Act.
The Senators sent an interaction to New Jersey media outlets within an attempt to drum up opposition to the anti-online gambling bill, which had been due to receive a Congressional hearing today (March 5).
The meeting has been postponed due to weather that is severe in Washington DC.
‘ This legislation will take tens of millions of dollars from Atlantic City’s casinos at a right time when it requires more revenue, not less,’ the Senators penned.
‘Not only would this bill do nothing to curb unlawful gaming that is online it would push dangerous black market vendors further into the shadows, putting adult consumers and children at also greater risk.
‘ In fact, the way that is best to deter dangerous criminal activity, including fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing, is to establish a well-regulated online gaming industry like the people which were implemented in New Jersey, Delaware and Nevada, aswell like in a number of other jurisdictions in North America and around the globe.’
Witnesses Largely Opposed to Online Gaming
RAWA, which had been reintroduced towards the House by Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) in January desires to prohibit all gambling that is online a federal level, with the exception of horseracing and fantasy sports. No exemption is designed for states like nj-new jersey that have actually chosen to legalize and regulvate online gaming within their borders or for the states that have titanic heart of the ocean slot machine actually adopted some form of internet lottery ticket product sales.
Specifically, RAWA wants to overturn the 2011 legal opinion by the Department of Justice, which asserted that the Wire Act prohibited only activities wagering over the Internet. This effectively opened the hinged door to the state-by-state regulation of online poker and casino games.
The forthcoming hearing has been criticized after having a list of witnesses due to testify was leaked towards the press, exposing it become comprised largely of online gaming opponents.
Leave it to the States
‘Congress has recently talked on this presssing issue,’ complained Whelan and Lesniak. ‘A federal ban on online gaming would reverse current law, which recognizes that horse racing, fantasy sports and intrastate authorized gaming and lotteries aren’t subject to restrictions set forth by Unlawful Web Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006.
‘ We believe strongly that gambling policy is best left to the states to choose, which has been the way it is throughout our nation’s history, and that New Jersey’s Internet video gaming policy should be determined by the citizens of New Jersey.’
Despite the hearing, RAWA continues to be an unpopular bit of legislation on Capitol Hill. The perception that Sheldon Adelson is pulling strings behind the scenes means it smacks of cronyism, while its determination to hinder state’s legal rights has alienated much of the Republican Party. Democrats, meanwhile, are unlikely to be observed to side with Adelson on this kind of issue that is contentious.
NJ Sports Betting Could Become Legalized For March Madness
The usa Third District Court of Appeals will hear a NJ sports law that is betting March 17th that could cause Garden State residents being allowed to place cash on the NCAA tournament. (Image: torrosports.com)
NJ sports wagering had been signed into law final October by Governor Chris Christie only to be blocked by a US district judge a month later who ruled the legislation violated a federal ban on sports wagering.
Garden State lawmakers and Gov. Christie have asked the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, to vacate your choice.
The March appeal that is 17th be heard by three federal judges, two who come with a specific degree of notoriety.
Maryanne Trump Barry, older sister to Donald Trump, and Marjorie Rendell, wife of former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, will join Julio Fuentes in presiding within the case.
Sports vs. Christie
State Senate Bill 2460 repeals wagering prohibitions on professional, collegiate, and sporting that is amateur athletic events, allowing NJ’s gambling enterprises and horse racing tracks to effortlessly operate as bookmakers. The NCAA, in association with MLB, NBA, NHL, and NFL, collectively sued citing the law undermines the integrity of these leagues and competitions.
US District Judge Michael Shipp oversaw the litigation last fall and sided with the sports leagues, saying the legislation violated the government’s ban on all sports wagering except in Nevada, Delaware, Montana, and Oregon.
Of course, that don’t stop lawmakers in Trenton from continuing their fight for legalization. ‘ The impact that is economic sports wagering can have on New Jersey is much too important to simply shrug our shoulders and move on,’ State Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) stated after the ruling in November.
The bill, introduced and authored by NJ State Sen. Ray Lesniak (D-Union), most likely the nation’s biggest online gambling ally, said of the senate’s appeal, ‘We’re simply after their lead. We’ll certainly have better possibility ahead of the Third Circuit than we had before Judge Shipp.’ Lesniak’s responses referenced Shipp’s relationship to his bro Marcel Shipp, a previous NFL that is professional running.
The three-judge panel seems to prefer lawmakers in nj-new Jersey, at least on paper. Former PA Governor Ed Rendell is an adamant supporter of gambling. During his two terms, he brought the Keystone State legalized land-based gambling enterprises to their commonwealth that previously only offered horse race and a lottery that is state-run.
He’s long touted the positive impacts casinos can yield, so it shouldn’t be unreasonable to consider his jobs have at least partially affected their spouse’s. To add icing on the cake, Rendell is an adamant Philadelphia sports fan.
Although he’s offered off their casinos in Atlantic City, Donald Trump’s presence remains felt. During his three-decade involvement in gambling, Trump was an outspoken proponent for sports wagering. Into the 1990s, he also said legalizing activities betting was ‘vital to keeping your taxes low,’ an argument few in the Garden State could disagree with today thinking about the enormous property, state, and local income tax rates currently being levied.
Maryanne Trump Barry is nine years his senior, but that does not mean she’sn’t been persuaded by her ‘little bro.’
Should the three judges overturn Shipp’s decision, the law may potentially become enacted just in time for the NCAA basketball tournament. The hearing will just take place two times before your bracket begins to crumble.
Miccarelli Resurrects Pennsylvania Online Gambling that is poker-Only Bill
Representative Nick Miccarelli resubmits his poker-only online gambling bill that is the same as final 12 months’s, and there’s no room for bad actors. (Image: politicspa.com)
Pennsylvania’s efforts to legalize online poker are gaining vapor utilizing the introduction of a 2nd poker bill to mention legislature in as many days.
State Representative Nick Miccarelli submitted their poker-only online gambling bill (HB 695) this week, which is understood to be identical towards the bill he presented final 12 months.
Unlike the bill introduced last week by State Representative John D Payne, that one is unflinching in its bad actor language. Miccarelli vows to ‘exclude those whom violated the Internet that is unlawful Gambling Act (UIGEA) of 2006.’
No Wriggle Room for PokerStars
With an one-off licensing fee of $5 million, HB 695 proposes a 14 percent taxation levy on gross gaming revenue, as does Payne’s bill.
This might be higher than Nevada’s but less than neighboring New Jersey, although with a considerably larger population Pennsylvania would be hoping for a higher tax yield.
‘Poker is unlike banking games in many respects making it best for the introduction of interactive video gaming,’ Miccarelli told House Members. ‘Poker operators aren’t participants in the games and are indifferent as towards the outcome.
‘Additionally, many Pennsylvania residents be involved in illegal and poker that is unregulated. Establishing a very good regulatory framework under the Gaming Control Board can assist in shutting down these illegal sites and enhance consumer protection for our gaming residents.’
Miccarelli’s bill proposes that new operators could be necessary to partner with existing permit holders in order to provide on-line poker in the state, that is also the truth in nj-new jersey, but unlike New Jersey there would be no third-party brands allowed, a notion that is not likely to please prospective entrants to the market.
The written text of the 2014 bill claimed: ‘To ensure that real control and supervision continues to be because of the licensed entity, the licensed entity’s publicly available Web website or similar general public portal should be marketed and distributed around people underneath the licensed entity’s own name and brand and not the brands of third events.’
No Player Pool Sharing
Unlike Payne’s bill, HB 695 does perhaps not include language for the negotiation that is possible of liquidity sharing compacts, which perhaps betrays a lack of foresight; the newly regulated markets elsewhere in the US are desperate to initiate liquidity-sharing, as they struggle with disappointing revenue figures.
The Payne bill, meanwhile, had to be amended this week since it was found that a ‘printer’s error’ had triggered confusion over a point that is somewhat integral. The definition of the ‘authorized games’ that the bill would be regulating had been defined in the text that is original ‘any interactive poker game approved by the board under this chapter.’
This had lead most of us to believe this, too, was a bill that is poker-only. Clarification through the Payne’s office, nonetheless, has confirmed his legislation is seeking to modify poker and casino.